Rhodes v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.
1. In a suit upon a policy of health and accident insurance, where the defense was that the policy was avoided by reason of certain false statements as to matters of fact material to the risk, made by the insured in his application for the policy, evidence tending *729to show that the defendant’s agent, who solicited the policy, had actual knowledge, before its issuance, of the falsity of the alleged material statements, was admissible for the purpose of showing a waiver or estoppel by or of the insurance company; and this is true notwithstanding the policy contained the provisions that “no agent…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. BellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- National Life & Accident Insurance v. CantrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
3Cited by8 opinions
- Allstate Insurance Company v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Patterson v. Cotton States Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
- Reserve Life Insurance v. BeardenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- National Life & Accident Insurance v. HullenderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Rhodes v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.