Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Western Bridge & Construction Co. v. Marsh

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1923No. 23680PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shepherd, District Judge.

This is an action in mandamus to require the respondents to issue warrants to pay the relator, and others similarly situated, for work done on certain federal aid projects of the state. There is no dispute as to the facts. The claims amount to perhaps half a million dollars. All of them arise upon contracts made and work done during the 1921.-1923 biennium. All of them have been approved by the depart*187rnent of public works, and by the department of finance as to amount. The contracts have been fully performed and the contractors are entitled to their pay.

But the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ledwith v. BrianNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Douglas County v. VinsonhalerNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  3. State ex rel. Platte County v. SheldonNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  4. State ex rel. Adams v. IrwinWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. State Bank of Miami v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. JoubertNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Belitz v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Flint v. MitchellNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Opinion No. (1982), Nebraska Attorney General Reports1982
  5. Opinion No. (1991), Nebraska Attorney General Reports1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API