State Bank of Miami v. City of Miami
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Ottawa County; Preston S. Davis, Judge. Action by the State Bank of Miami against the City of Miami. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtLoofbourrow, J.
The petition in this case consists of 45 counts, of which 26 are based upon city warrants and nineteen upon open accounts. The said warrants were executed in due form by the city of Miami and show upon their face that they were drawn upon the contingent, the salary, and the street and bridge funds. The answer consists, first, of a general denial, and further alleges, in substance, that each and all of the city warrants set forth in the several causes of action are and were, at the date of their issuance, in excess of 80 per cent, of the taxes levied for city purposes during said fiscal year…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Andrew County ex rel. Kirtley v. SchellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
- Johnson v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
- Board of Comrs. Custer Co. v. De LanaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
- State ex rel. Vaughan v. ApplebySupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Sulphur v. State Ex Rel. Lankford, Bank Com'rSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Gentis v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Oklahoma City v. DerrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Town of Red Fork v. Gantt-Baker Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Fabric Fire Hose Co. v. Town of CaddoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.