Legal Opinion

Anusie-Howard v. Todd

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided January 29, 2013No. Civil No. WDQ-12-0199PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WILLIAM D. QUARLES, JR., District Judge.

Tanya Anusie-Howard sued William Todd, Michael Baker, Michael Eppig, Anthony Lee, and the Baltimore County Board of Education (collectively the “defendants”) for violations of the Family Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”).1 Pending are Anusie-Howard’s motion to strike and the defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. No hearing is required. See Local Rule 105.6. For the following reasons, Anusie-Howard’s motion to strike will be denied. The defendants’ motion to dismiss will be granted in part and denied in part.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Steffensen (In re Steffensen)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2014
  2. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Dimensions Healthcare SystemDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2016
  3. Gaines v. McDonaldDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2015
  4. Aly v. United States Department of TreasuryDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024
  5. Anusie-Howard v. ToddDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API