Hillblom v. County of Fresno
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ F.R.Civ.P. 12 MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT
LAWRENCE J. O’NEILL, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Defendants County of Fresno (“County”), former County Sheriff Richard Pierce (“Sheriff Pierce”) and three County Sheriffs Department officers 1 seek F.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal of plaintiffs’ 2 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“section 1983”) and related claims on grounds that the claims fail to allege necessary elements. Defendants pursue an alternative F.R.Civ.P. 12(e) motion for a more definite statement as to plaintiffs’ section 1983 illegal arrest and tort in essence…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Young v. City of VisaliaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
- Shelley v. County of San JoaquinDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2014
- Berglund v. Canyon CountyDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2020
- Brooke v. Cooper House LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
- Johnson v. Canyon County, IdahoDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.