Legal Opinion
People v. Murray
Criminal Court of the City of New York
Decided May 5, 1989PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Harold B. Beeler, J.
Defendant herein, charged by information with unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree (Penal Law § 165.05 [1]), moves, inter alia, to dismiss the accusatory instrument pursuant to CPL 170.30 (1) (a); 170.35 (1) (a); and 100.40 (1) (c) on the ground that the factual allegations in the information do not establish every element of the offense charged.
Pursuant to subdivision (1) of Penal Law § 165.05, a person is guilty of unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree *510when, "[k]nowing that he does not have the consent of the owner, he takes,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. McCalebNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- People v. RobyNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. ButlerNew York Supreme Court · 1983
3Cited by5 opinions
- Anderson v. J.D.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. VelezCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1990
- State v. HoagCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- In Interest of JDNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Jeanty v. The City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2024