Legal Opinion
Chicago, B. & Q. R. v. Moore
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided March 24, 1891PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Error to the district court for Lancaster county. Tried below before Field, J. Citations and contentions of counsel are, in the main, referred to in opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.
This suit was tried in the Lancaster county district court upon the following stipulation of facts:
“It is hereby stipulated between the plaintiff and the defendant in the above entitled cause that the following are the facts in this cause: It is agreed that the plaintiff commenced working for the defendant for a price agreed upon by and between them, to be fifty dollars per month, and in pursuance of said contract the plaintiff worked .two days in the latter part of March and fifteen days in the fore part of April, 1888, amounting to $25.92, and that this sum is now due from the defendant to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pierce v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. DooleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- Wright v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
- Drake v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Mooney v. U. P. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1882
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Singer Manufacturing Co. v. FlemingNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- O'Connor v. WalterNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
- Dodge County v. BurnsNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
- Leech v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915