Legal Opinion

Davis v. Smiley

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 25, 1925No. 15483PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. One who is engaged in construction work on a public highway and who is in control of the highway for the purpose of doing such work, and who, in furtherance of such work, erects a substantial barricade in the roadway for the purpose of closing the road to' public travel, and who continues to have control over the barricade while it remains in the roadway, is under a duty to maintain the barricade with due care and diligence to- avoid damage from its maintenance - to any one traveling along the road. This is true irrespective of whether there is any liability on the part of the county…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Arnold, Estes & Co. v. Henry CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1889

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mann v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  2. Abercrombie v. Ledbetter-Johnson Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  3. Doby v. W. L. Florence Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  4. State Construction Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  5. Brown v. Atlanta Gas Light Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API