Legal Opinion

Arnold, Estes & Co. v. Henry County

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 9, 1889PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Actions. County matters. Bridges. Bonds. Bamages. Before Hon. A. M. Speer, judge pro hac vice. Henry superior court. April term, 1888. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Simmons, Justice.

Arnold, Estes & Co. sued the county of Henry for damages, alleging, in substance, that a horse and mule belonging to them had been drowned, and a certain wagon, also belonging to them, had been injured, while crossing a public bridge in said county, by reason of certain defects in the bridge, fully set out in the declaration. They also alleged that the building of the bridge had been let out to a contractor, who built the bridge under the contract, and that the county had neglected to take a bond from said contractor. They alleged that, by the death of the animals and the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. County of Monroe v. FlyntSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Construction Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  2. Davis v. SmileyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  3. Laurens County v. McLendonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  4. Dougherty County v. NewsomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  5. Wells v. Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API