Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Rader v. Campbell

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1950No. 10138Published

1ConcurrenceHaymond, Judge

I concur in the decision of this Court in .affirming the decree of the circuit court granting specific performance of the oral contract involved in this suit. I do not, however, accept Point 2 of the syllabus, in the form in which it appears, as a correct statement of the law. It is incomplete, unsatisfactory and misleading. In its present imperfect form it merely says, in effect, that, if the defense of the statute of frauds is not relied upon as a defense, an oral agreement to execute a deed in the settlement of a pending action of ejectment by locating a disputed boundary line may be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WorkmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Hissam v. ParrishWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Hermann v. GoddardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Wegmann v. ClarkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Hastings v. MontgomeryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API