Hissam v. Parrish
West Virginia Supreme Court
cited Pom. Eq. Jur. §§ 1401; 1402, 1405; Pom. Spe. Perf. § 165; Beach, Cor. § 517; Code c. 54, s. 8; 25 W. Va. 127? 528; 35 W. Ya. 194. cited 22 Am. & Eng. Euc. Law, 1020, 1021; 35 W. Ya. 194; 25 W. Va. 470; 14 S. E. Rep. 255; 3 N. E. Rep. 142; 79 Ala. 180; 6 Colo. 318; 45 N. J. Eq. 95; 38 N. E. Rep. 432; 82 Ala. 370; 8 So. Rep. 368.
1Opinion of the Court
ENGLISH, Judge:
This was a suit in equity brought by D. E. Hissam, in the Circuit Court of Cabell county, against M. F. Parrish, S. J. Kane, S. W. Neville, and A. H. Nagle, on the 23rd day of May, 1893, praying that the defendants, and each of them, be required to specifically perform a contract bearing date the 28th day of September, 1891, a copy of which is exhibited with the plaintiff’s bill, and which agreement purports to have been made between D. F. Hissam, of the first part, and the Milton Manufacturing Company, of the second part, but which agreement appears to have been signed and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Benedict v. LynchNew York Court of Chancery · 1815
- Duvall v. MyersHigh Court of Chancery of Maryland · 1850
- Patrick v. HortonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1868
- Burke v. ParkeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by17 opinions
- Virginian Export Coal Co. v. Rowland Land Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1926
- Ulrey v. KeithIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
- Baruch v. W. B. Haggerty, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1939
- Moody v. CraneIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
- Connell v. YostWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.