United States v. Parthenya Whitney
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
This appeal presents the question whether the double jeopardy clause of the fifth amendment bars the district court from relying on specific acts of misconduct in revoking a defendant’s probation where those acts formed the basis of a previous parole revocation. Because we find that the double jeopardy clause is not applicable to parole or probation revocation proceedings, we hold that the double jeopardy clause does not bar consideration of certain acts in probation revocation proceedings where those acts formed the basis of a previous parole revocation. We therefore affirm.
In May, 1975,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Breed v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. KordelSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- James Franklin Dunn v. California Department of Corrections, California Adult Authority, and L. S. Nelson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Parthenya WhitneyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Hardy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re the Personal Restraint of MaynerWashington Supreme Court · 1986