Legal Opinion

United States v. Parthenya Whitney

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 29, 1981No. 80-7254PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REVISED OPINION

Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, KRAVITCH and HATCHETT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

In this case, we held that the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States does not bar consideration of certain evidence in probation revocation proceedings where the same evidence has formed the basis for a previous parole revocation proceeding. While we adhere to our holding, we add these comments in order to clarify our opinion.

The facts are adequately set out in our prior opinion, United States v. Whitney, 632 F.2d 654 (5th Cir. 1980), hereby withdrawn,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Breed v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Swisher v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. Parthenya WhitneyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Stringer v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  2. Raymond Showery v. Leo Samaniego, Sheriff, El Paso County, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  3. Sam Richard Kell v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  4. Thompson v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  5. United States v. John Franklin Miller, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API