Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Michaliga

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 23, 2008PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

ALLEN, J.:

¶ 1 This is an appeal by the Commonwealth from the order of the trial court directing it to prosecute a private criminal complaint that the district attorney’s office had previously disapproved. We reverse.

¶ 2 The pertinent facts1 and procedural history may be summarized as follows: In April 2006, Ron Romanoski, individually, and t/a P & R Builders (“Romanoski”) entered into a contract with Erica Michali-ga (“Michaliga”), the owner and operator of Atmosphere Salon and Day Spa (“the salon”) for repairs caused by fire damage to the salon. According to Romanoski’s private…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thunberg v. StrauseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. In Re Private Criminal Complaint of WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Commonwealth v. CooperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Piscanio AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re Private Criminal Complaints of RaffertySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Logan v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2010
  3. Armolt, J. v. Kerestes, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Com. v. Alston, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Com. v. Kerns, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API