Commonwealth v. Michaliga
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
ALLEN, J.:
¶ 1 This is an appeal by the Commonwealth from the order of the trial court directing it to prosecute a private criminal complaint that the district attorney’s office had previously disapproved. We reverse.
¶ 2 The pertinent facts1 and procedural history may be summarized as follows: In April 2006, Ron Romanoski, individually, and t/a P & R Builders (“Romanoski”) entered into a contract with Erica Michali-ga (“Michaliga”), the owner and operator of Atmosphere Salon and Day Spa (“the salon”) for repairs caused by fire damage to the salon. According to Romanoski’s private…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Thunberg v. StrauseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- In Re Private Criminal Complaint of WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. CooperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Piscanio AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re Private Criminal Complaints of RaffertySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Logan v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2010
- Armolt, J. v. Kerestes, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Com. v. Alston, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Com. v. Kerns, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.