Legal Opinion

State ex rel. McNulty v. Glasner

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1914PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Original proceeding in mandamus by the State, on the relation of Prank McNulty, against Frank Glasner, Secretary of State.

1Opinion of the Court

' PER CURIAM.

The relator has instituted this original action in manduaraus to compel defendant, as Secretary of State toi certify the name of relator as a proposed candidate for 'Congress to ibe voted for ,at the primary election, March 24, 1914.. It is alleged that relator is a member of the Republican party; that his name has been regularly certified, as a proposed candidate for Congress for the Second congressional district of this state, by the regularly and duly constituted minority proposal committee of the Republican .party; that relator has duly signed and filed in the office of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ellingham v. DyeIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. State ex rel. New Orleans Canal & Banking Co. v. HeardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1895
  3. City Council of Denver v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1904
  4. Hall v. . People of the State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  5. State ex rel. Cooper v. BlaisdellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Grigsby v. OstrootSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  2. State Ex Rel. Coon v. MorrisonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Schaller v. EricsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  4. State Ex Rel. Grigsby v. OstrootSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  5. State ex rel. Hitchcock v. TillSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API