Legal Opinion · Dissent

State ex rel. Hitchcock v. Till

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1926No. File No. 6346Published

1DissentGates, P. J.

Section 7236, Rev. Code 1919, makes it the duty of the county auditor to- place on the ballot for the general election the name of every candidate whose nomination has been certified or filed with the county auditor. Relator was proposed at the Democratic county proposal meeting for the office of state senator. Pie did not sign the declaration. Thereby a vacancy was believed to exist, and he was certified as the nominee 1o fill the vacancy. In State ex rel Picton v. Doolittle, 50 S. D. —, 209 N.W. 851, this court held on July 23, 1920, that such could not be done, although previously under a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. McNulty v. GlasnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  2. State ex rel. Picton v. DoolittleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API