Legal Opinion

Standish v. Gold Creek Mining Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 26, 1937No. 8485PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

An able petition for rehearing points out that dictum in our opinion may be construed to assert that, if a suit be filed in a division or district other than that in which the defendant resides, the filing confers on the court no jurisdiction of the subject matter. The petition does not alter our decision, but the matters discussed are of sufficient importance to warrant clarification. The opinion is amended to read as follows:. This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment dismissing an action at law for want of jurisdiction over the person of the defendant.

Plaintif…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte SchollenbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Camp v. GressSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Washington-Southern Navigation Co. v. Baltimore & Philadelphia Steamboat Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Venner v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Rosencrans v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Jacobo CastilloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Ore Steamship Corporation v. D/SA/S HasselCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  3. Searles v. SearlesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. McNeil Construction Co. v. Livingston State BankDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1957
  5. Tassie v. Continental Oil Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API