Legal Opinion

United Pacific Insurance v. Trachsel

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 28, 1987No. 83-1759C; CA A37573Published

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

United Pacific Insurance Co. brought this action, seeking, inter alia, a declaratory judgment that it owes defendant nothing under its fire insurance policy, contending that defendant breached the policy by intentionally starting a fire which damaged his property. The jury agreed and returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff. Defendant appeals, contending that the trial court erred in failing to compel the production of all documents concerning an investigation made by a fire cause expert retained by plaintiff. We affirm.

The fire, which damaged defendant’s barn and truck, occurred on June 3,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. BRINK ET UX v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Farmers Ins. Group of Oregon v. HansenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. Tubbs v. HendricksonNew York Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Ritrovato v. Hartford Insurance GroupNew York Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API