BRINK ET UX v. Multnomah County
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
The defendant county initiated a condemnation proceeding to acquire a portion of plaintiffs’ land for the purpose of relocating and widening a county road. The Board of County Commissioners fixed the damages for the taking at $5,725. Plaintiffs appealed to the Circuit Court for Multnomah County and obtained a verdict and judgment for $8,000, together with interest. Plaintiffs appeal from that judgment, assigning as error the exclusion of certain evidence which they sought to elicit from Elmer Kolberg, a witness called on their behalf.
When Kolberg was called as a witness, defendant’s counsel…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
- City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Robertson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1943
- Schmitt v. EmerySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- House v. Combined Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1996
- Nielsen v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Willey v. WhitmanArizona Supreme Court · 1962
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.