Legal Opinion

Baldinger v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 19, 1986No. 2100 C.D. 1983PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Palladino,

Introduction

This matter comes before the Court following four days of trial on the merits. The issue presented is whether the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania shall be permanently enjoined from using the Smith and Wesson Breathalyzer 1000 for evidentiary purposes in any criminal or civil proceeding and from listing it as an approved evidential breath tester. This Petition for Review was filed in 1983; since that time, numerous changes have been made in the regulatory structure. Petitioner, Kenneth D. Baldinger, asserts in his complaint that the Breathalyzer 1000 is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moyer v. DavisCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Moyer v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Baldinger v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SnellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Bush v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Sweeney v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Sweeney v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API