Legal Opinion

Di Santo v. City of Warrenville

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 4, 1978No. 76-558PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE SEIDENFELD

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and all users of water from the defendant city, sued to rescind a contract by which the city had acquired a waterworks and sewerage system from a private owner. They also sought refunds on behalf of the class. The trial court dismissed the complaint on grounds of laches and lack of standing; and further found that the class action was improper. Plaintiffs appeal.

The City of Warrenville and the surrounding area had been dependent upon Westview Utilities Company, a subsidiary of Utilities,…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1973

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lawrence C. Bieneman v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  2. Kluk v. LangIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Tillman v. PritzkerIllinois Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Iowa-Illinois Gas & Electric Co. v. Iowa State Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  5. Rosenthal v. City of Crystal LakeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API