Legal Opinion

Marsh v. Goldstein

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 9, 1960PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCounihan, J.

This is an action of tort in which the plaintiff seeks to recover for personal injuries sustained by her when she fell on steps in the front of an apartment house owned by the defendants at 95 Ellington Street, Dorchester, on August 28, 1954, between 2 and 2:30 a.m. A jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff under leave reserved. Subsequently, on motion, the judge entered a verdict for the defendants, subject to the exception of the plaintiff. There was no error.

The facts as they appear in the bill of exceptions in their aspects most favorable to the plaintiff are as follows: These steps…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stedfast v. Rebon Realty Co. Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
  2. McDermott v. Merchants Cooperative BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lindsey v. MassiosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. Rubin v. PrescottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  3. Jellison v. GleasonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Leighton v. ZiminskyMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API