Chin Wah v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtHand, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The evidence was certainly sufficient to convict Ing Lee on the conspiracy count. The Chinaman who ordered the trunk to be sent to 113 Court street was, of course, in complicity with the senders and knew its contents. The drug is extremely valuable, and people do not send it such long distances to unadvised consignees. Nor did this unidentified Chinaman send it to 113 Court street without prearrangement with some one there. The only question was whether the intended receiver was one or more of the three defendants or another person, the proprietor of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Yee Hem v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Meldrum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1907
- United States v. MeldrumDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1906
- Sanborn v. BayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911
3Cited by4 opinions
- Matthew J. Connelly and T. Lamar Caudle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
- Cahill v. Mayflower Bus Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- Cahill v. Mayflower Bus Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1934
- Peterson v. O'MalleyDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2023