Legal Opinion
United States v. Peter J. Kaufmann, Jan E. Ostermeier and William C. Cummings, Defendants
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 3, 1986No. 85-1692, 85-1693 and 85-1695PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.
The defendants were convicted of conspiracy to purchase marijuana with intent to distribute. They requested a new trial because one of the witnesses at trial, a government agent,’ had testified falsely about the number of telephone conversations he had had with one of the defendants the morning of the sting operation. The district court denied the motion for a new trial. We affirm.
I
The four co-defendants in this case, Peter J. Kaufmann, Jan E. Ostermeier, William C. Cummings and Terrell D. Brown, 1 were convicted by a jury of conspiracy to purchase marijuana with intent…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Larrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1928
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. James Douglas, Martin L. Pruitt, Leon MasonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Scott A. FountainCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- United States v. $79,123.49 in United States Cash and Currency, Appeal of Jan E. Ostermeier, Stotler & Company, Terrell D. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Oluremi Adebayo and Christopher A. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Dickson VerasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.