Hannahville Indian Community v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILLI, Senior Judge.
Plaintiffs, discrete bands of Potawatomie Indians residing in Michigan, Indiana, and Wisconsin, brought this action before the Indian Claims Commission (the Commission) in 1948. In 1951, without significant activity in the interim, they amended their petition to assert the claim that now constitutes the whole of the suit and is the subject of this opinien viz, that an accounting would establish, first, that plaintiffs had been wrongfully deprived of certain annuities and other payments lawfully due them under 12 treaties concluded by the Potawatomie and the United…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Seminole Nation v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Navajo Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
- United States v. Mescalero Apache TribeUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Pam-To-Pee v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Phineas Pam-To-Pee v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- TOMAC v. Norton, Gale A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Oglala Sioux Tribe of the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation v. United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Pottawatomi Nation in Canada v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1992
- Oglala Sioux Tribe of the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation v. United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009