Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pharr v. N.C. D.O.T.

North Carolina Industrial Commission

Decided May 27, 2003No. I.C. NO. TA-16220Published

1Dissent

In a non-jury case, such as one before the Industrial Commission, after plaintiff has rested his case, defendant may move pursuant to Rule 41(b), Rules of Civil Procedure, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, for involuntary dismissal on the ground that upon the facts and the law plaintiff has shown no right to relief. Woodlief v. Johnson, 75 N.C. App. 49,330 S.E.2d 265 (1985). However, a judge is not compelled to find facts and pass upon a motion for dismissal at close of plaintiff's evidence; he may decline to render any judgment until all evidence is in, and, exceptin the clearest cases, he should…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bolkhir v. North Carolina State UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Harrell v. W. B. Lloyd Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Passmore v. WoodardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  4. In Re Incorporation of Westover CanalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Woodlief v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API