Legal Opinion
Dubuc v. Johnson
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 2, 2003No. 01-5122PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1207ORDER
We VACATE the district court’s grant of Plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis and direct Plaintiff to pay the full filing fee within thirty days. Plaintiffs failure to pay the filing fee as directed will result in the dismissal of his appeal for failure to prosecute. See Young v. Miller, 144 F.3d 1298 (10th Cir.1998). The opinions of the panel in support of and in opposition to this Order are attached.
OPINION
McKAY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Dubuc appeals for the second time claims brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On Plaintiffs first appeal, we affirmed the district court’s…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- White v. ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Haynes v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Clovis Carl Green., Jr. v. Honorable Edward W. Nottingham, District Judge Honorable Richard M. Borchers, Magistrate JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- William C. Houchin, Jr. v. Aristedes W. Zavaras, Director, Colorado Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Isby v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Wilson v. SirmonsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Smith v. Veterans AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Victor Manuel Torres-CastroCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Strope v. CummingsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.