State v. Dow
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Per curiam
The defendant, Frank Dow, appeals his second degree murder conviction, arguing that the evidence at trial was insufficient to establish circumstances manifesting an extreme indifference to the value of human life and also that the phrase “extreme indifference to the value of human life” is unconstitutionally vague. We affirm.
The defendant was indicted for second degree murder, RSA 630:l-b, 1(b). The indictment alleged that the defendant “did recklessly cause the death of Kathy Delong Tetu by asphyxiation under circumstances manifesting an extreme indifference to the value of human life in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Godfrey v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- People v. PoplisNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- State v. CrockerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- State v. FlickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
- State v. SaucierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
- Brown v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
- State v. SchultzSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.