Berry v. Crawford
Indiana Supreme Court
1DissentRucker, J.
As I understand the majority’s position, this Court has the authority to decide the issue presented to us today, but for matters of “prudence” the Court declines to exercise that authority. And in determining whether prudence demands this Court should not intervene, the majority adopts a test that finds no support in our long standing case authority. That is, an “express constitutional limitation ” on an otherwise constitutionally sanctioned legislative act. Op. at 419, 420 (emphasis added). In other words, according to the majority, so long as a particular constitutional provision permits…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Community for Creative Non-Violence v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- St. Vincent Hospital & Health Care Center, Inc. v. SteeleIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Boehm v. Town of St. JohnIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Indiana High School Athletic Ass'n v. Carlberg Ex Rel. CarlbergIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Ellingham v. DyeIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.