Legal Opinion

State v. Hebert

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 4, 1937No. 34169PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Justice.

The relator, A. Prudent Hebert, was charged with forgery. On arraignment he pleaded not guilty and, as he was unable to employ counsel, the court appointed J. O. Modisette, Esq., to represent him. On motion of the district attorney the case was fixed for trial three days later. The district attorney then suggested in open court that he had grounds for believing the defendant might be insane, and he presented an order, which the trial judge signed, appointing a lunacy commission for the purpose of determining whether the defendant was in such mental state as would permit him to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. ReedSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1889
  2. State v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  3. State v. WattsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
  4. State v. NeuSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
  5. State v. HarvilleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. GunterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
  2. State v. LuquetteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
  4. State v. HebertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
  5. State v. SampleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API