Legal Opinion
Glunk v. Noone
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 16, 2016No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-5565PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Savage, District Judge.
Richard P. Glunk, acting pro se, brings this § 1983 action alleging all defendants *457deprived him of his substantive and procedural due process rights in connection with the suspension of his medical license which resulted in the loss of his hospital staff privileges. He also asserts state law claims for breach of contract and tortious interference with business relations against defendants R. Barrett Noone, M.D., Scott M. Goldman, M.D., Marie Van-Buskirk and Main Line Health, Inc. (“MLH”) (collectively, the “MLH defendants”).
We shall dismiss the § 1983…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Parker v. Sch. Dist. of Phila.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Anand v. Independence Blue CrossDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- GRAVES v. PHILADELPHIA FAMILY COURTDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- PENNSYLVANIA INFORMED CONSENT ADVOCATES, INC. v. UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEMDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- RIPPY v. PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTHDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019