Legal Opinion

Richard Gillman v. Waters, McPherson McNeill P.C. Estate of Jack Rosen, The

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 24, 2001No. 00-2111PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

POLLAK, District Judge.

This appeal from a grant of summary judgment presents questions arising under New Jersey’s “entire controversy doctrine” — a body of law that has given rise to much litigation and a substantial body of academic commentary.

I

With a view to clarifying the setting in which the questions on appeal are presented, we begin by describing the underlying controversy, and the resultant state court litigation, which together form the predicate for the case at bar.

Appellant Richard Gillman was for many years a senior executive of Bally Manufacturing Corporation…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Olds v. DonnellySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  2. State v. BursteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  3. State v. KnightSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  4. Shebar v. Sanyo Business Systems Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  5. Circle Chevrolet Co. v. Giordano, Halleran & CieslaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re WorldCom, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  2. CONNELL, FOLEY v. Israel TravelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  3. Arch Insurance Company (Europe) Ltd., et al. v. Thomas K. ReillyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2026
  4. John Doe v. Princeton UniversityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API