Legal Opinion

United States v. Sam C. Martino, Joseph C. Russello and Rolando Gonzalez Rodriguez

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 2, 1982No. 78-3611PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES C. HILL, Circuit Judge:

We granted rehearing en banc in this case to decide whether the term “interest” as used in 18 U.S.C. § 1963(a)(1), the crimi*953nal forfeiture provision of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations statute (RICO), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968,1 includes income or profits derived from a pattern of racketeering activity. Specifically at issue in this case is the forfeitability of insurance proceeds obtained through the conduct of an arson ring. The district court resolved this question of statutory construction in the government’s favor. On appeal a panel of this…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Callanan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. United States v. Wong Kim Bo, A/K/A Yee Kuk Ho, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Tal v. HoganCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. Rex C. Cauble, Individually and Doing Business as Cauble EnterprisesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  4. United States v. Pierre Michel Henri Giry and Steven SewardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  5. In Re Catanella and EF Hutton and Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API