Legal Opinion

Sproul Construction Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1964No. 7323PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOISE, Justice.

This action was commenced as a suit to foreclose materialmen’s liens. The plaintiffs, Air Service, Inc., and Air Conditioning Equipment Company, furnished labor and materials to the defendant, Associated Roofing and Supply Company, Inc., hereinafter referred to as “Associated,” in connection with the performance by Associated of a sub-contract between it and defendants, Sproul Construction Company, Sproul Brothers, Inc., and Sproul-Brozo Construction Corp., hereinafter referred to as “Sproul.” Upon failure of Associated to pay plaintiffs as agreed, liens were duly filed and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Hill v. American Surety Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Southwestern Portland Cement Co. v. WilliamsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Pickens County v. National Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1926
  4. Gibbs v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1952
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Eagle River Union Free High School DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sproul Construction Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Ulpiano Casal, Inc. v. Totty Manufacturing Corp.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API