Legal Opinion

State v. Tallman

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 22, 2003No. CM0120164; A115559PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

The state appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence, arguing that the sentence imposed by the trial court for one of defendant’s convictions is unlawful. On review for errors of law, ORS 138.222(4)(a), we vacate defendant’s sentences and remand the case for resentencing.

Defendant pleaded guilty to criminal mistreatment in the first degree.1 ORS 163.205. Under the sentencing guidelines grid block applicable to that conviction, the presumptive sentence for defendant’s crime was an incarceration term of 19 to 20 months. At the conclusion of the plea hearing, the court took the case…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brown v. Oregon State BarOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. League of Oregon Cities v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. ZimmermanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API