Legal Opinion
United States v. George Allen Wilson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 7, 1976No. 74-2523PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before KOELSCH and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and HILL,* District Judge. HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge:
Wilson appeals from his conviction for bank robbery. Wilson contends that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress items obtained from a warrantless search of Willis’s suitcase, in rulings on several evidentiary matters, and in instructing the jury on circumstantial evidence.
The day before the robbery Wilson, his codefendant Murray, Taylor and Willis left Los Angeles and spent the evening together in the apartment of Sharon McKee in Oakland. Wilson and Taylor thereafter…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Mancusi v. DeForteSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Morris W. Gordon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Charles M. Luck v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- United States v. Richard AicheleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Joseph N. BasinskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- United States v. William E. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Abel Gilberto Salinas-CanoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Michael Roybal Oaxaca, United States of America v. Steven Edward DelmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.