Legal Opinion

United States v. Abel Gilberto Salinas-Cano

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 18, 1992No. 91-2054PublishedCited by 127 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.

This case requires that we review the authority of a person other than the owner to consent to a search of a closed suitcase. Abel Gilberto Salinas-Cano entered a conditional plea of guilty to possession with intent to distribute more than 500 grams of cocaine. 1 He contends on appeal that his girlfriend did not have authority to consent to a search of his suitcase in which the cocaine was discovered. For the reasons set out below, we reverse.

I

The relevant facts are essentially undisputed. Mr. Salinas-Cano left his suitcase at his girlfriend’s apartment, where he spent…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Frazier v. CuppSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. United States v. KaroSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. United States v. Miguel RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by127 opinions

  1. People v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Bliss v. FrancoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. Joseph N. BasinskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. Sharon Legail WelchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Schmitt DegassoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004

122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API