Legal Opinion

In re L.M.A.T

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 2002No. 02-137PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cotter

¶1 Donald, the natural father of L.M.A.T. and B.L.F.T., appeals from two Nineteenth Judicial District Court orders that were entered during child protection proceedings for his daughters. Although the State had petitioned for permanent legal custody and termination of parental rights, following the evidentiary hearing, the District Court did not proceed on the issue of termination, but rather entered an order adjudicating L.M.A.T. and B.L.F.T. as youths in need of care and granting the Department of Public Health and Human Services (DPHHS) temporary legal custody for six months. The court…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Unified Industries, Inc. v. EasleyMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In re E.K.Montana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. In re A.N.Montana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. In re J.N.Montana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. In Re JNMontana Supreme Court · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re GMMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. In re G. M.Montana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. In re D.B.J.Montana Supreme Court · 2012
  4. In re M.A.L.Montana Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Matter of A.L.P., YINCMontana Supreme Court · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API