Legal Opinion

United States v. Frank Runnels (86-1923) and Arnold Shapero (86-1922)

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 19, 1987No. 86-1922, 86-1923Published

1Opinion of the Court

833 F.2d 1183

126 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2789, 56 USLW 2255,

107 Lab.Cas. P 10,228,

24 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 107

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Frank RUNNELS (86-1923) and Arnold Shapero (86-1922),

Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 86-1922, 86-1923.

United States Court of Appeals,

Sixth Circuit.

Argued May 8, 1987.

Decided Oct. 19, 1987.

Neil H. Fink (argued), Detroit, Mich., William J. Weinstein (argued), Southfield, Mich., for defendants-appellants.

Keith E. Corbett (argued), Asst. U.S. Atty., Detroit, Mich., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before GUY and BOGGS, Circuit Judges, and EDWARDS, Senior Circuit Judge.

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. United States v. FeolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Cox v. Chesapeake & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Parr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API