Legal Opinion

Austin v. Sears

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 18, 1960No. 37866PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURKE, District Judge.

This is an action by one Karen Austin for the proceeds of a Federal Group Life Insurance Policy issued by Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. The insurance company has deposited the funds in dispute into the registry of the court and is no *486longer a party to the litigation. The defendants are Robert C. Sears and Lavonne Stern, a son and adopted daughter of Cecil Sears.

The Group policy involved became effective on or about November 24, 1954 and Cecil Sears, an employee of the Internal Revenue Service, thereafter became insured according to the terms and to the extent therein…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cook v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Pimentel v. Conselho Supremo de Uniao Portugueza do Estado da CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Moths v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
  4. Hester v. HesterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
  5. Woods v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Robert C. Sears and Lavonne Stern v. Karen AustinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  2. Stribling v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1968
  3. Hewitt v. Thrift Saving PlanDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API