Legal Opinion

Pimentel v. Conselho Supremo de Uniao Portugueza do Estado da California

California Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1936No. S. F. No. 15441PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

This action was brought by the minor plaintiffs through their guardian to recover the benefits under an insurance policy upon the life of their father, Antonio Cardozo Pimentel, issued by the defendant, a fraternal benefit society. Plaintiffs had been named as beneficiaries in the policy but, shortly before his death, the insured attempted to change the beneficiary clause in favor of his brother, J. C. Pimentel. The defendant paid into court the $1400 due under the policy and, by cross-complaint, brought in J. C. Pimentel as a party. The trial court found there had been no change of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jory v. Supreme Council American Legion of HonorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. McLaughlin v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Johnston v. KearnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Supreme Lodge of the Fraternal Brotherhood v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  5. Adams v. Grand Lodge of the A. O. U. W.California Supreme Court · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Susan Cripps, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant v. Life Insurance Company of North America, Plaintiff-Cross-Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Cook v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Watenpaugh v. State Teacher's Retirement SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. BankAmerica Pension Plan v. McMathCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Robert C. Sears and Lavonne Stern v. Karen AustinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API