Boeing Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentCallow, C.J.
(dissenting)—We are asked in this case to determine whether an insured's liability to pay CERCLA response costs constitute "sums which the insured [has] become legally obligated to pay as damages" within the meaning of a standard comprehensive general liability insurance policy. As the majority opinion itself acknowledges, the plain, ordinary, and popular meaning of the word damages is "reparation for detriment or injury sustained." Because CERCLA response costs are not "reparation for detriment or injury sustained," CERCLA response costs are not payable "as damages" within the plain meaning…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- State Farm General Insurance v. EmersonWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- United States v. Conservation Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1985
- Transcontinental Ins. Co. v. WA. PUBLIC UTILITIES DISTRICTS'UTILITY SYSTEMWashington Supreme Court · 1988
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.