State v. Steen
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from, Mahaska District Court.— Hon. John T. Scott, Judge. Indictment for keeping a bouse of ill fame. Tbe defendant was convicted and appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
I. Tbe first proposition advanced by counsel for appellánt is that tbe verdict of guilty is not warranted by tbe evidence. A reading of the record brings us to. a different conclusion. We shall not rehearse the testi*309mony. It is sufficient to say that, if believed by the jury, the case made by the witnesses for the State affords abundant ground for the appellant’s conviction. The credibility of the witnesses on either side was a matter for the jury alone to pass upon, and we find nothing to indicate that in so doing they were influenced by passion or prejudice.
1. Examination explanation^ by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Graeter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Forbes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
- State v. WellsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893
- Clinton National Bank v. StudemannSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. GardnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- State v. MauchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
- Hampton v. BurrellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
- State v. BurleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Becker v. Incorporated Town of ChurdanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.