Legal Opinion

Schelter v. Schelter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 15, 1994PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed with costs to defendant. Memorandum: Funds held in escrow or in a custodial capacity are not subject to an attorney’s retaining lien (see, Marsano v State Bank of Albany, 27 AD2d 411, appeal dismissed 23 NY2d 1018; Entertainment & Amusements v Barnes, 49 Misc 2d 316). Thus, the sum of $8,000, held by defendant’s former attorney subject to further direction by the court as part of an undertaking pending the appeal of a judgment for arrears in child support, was not subject to the former attorney’s retaining lien, and Supreme Court properly directed that the attorney…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Entertainment & Amusements of Ohio, Inc. v. BarnesNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Marsano v. State Bank of AlbanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
  3. Levine v. LevineNew York Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Marsano v. State Bank of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1969

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sue Davidson, P.C. v. NaranjoWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Shipman v. City of New York Support Collection UnitNew York Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Weinberg v. SultanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  4. Goldberg & Connolly v. Graystone Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. Piccarreto v. MuraNew York Supreme Court · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API