Legal Opinion

Smith v. Ohio

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 20, 1990No. 89-5999PublishedCited by 178 opinions

1Per curiam

This case raises the single question whether a warrantless search that provides probable cause for an arrest can nonetheless be justified as an incident of that arrest. A divided Ohio Supreme Court answered that question in the affirmative, reasoning that the search was neither remote in time nor place from the arrest. We disagree.

On a June evening, as petitioner and a companion exited a private residence and entered the parking lot of a YMCA, they were approached by two plainclothes officers of the Ash-land, Ohio, Police Department. The officers were driving-in an unmarked police vehicle.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by178 opinions

  1. Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. State v. CrutcherTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  3. United States v. Ruben PereaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Rodney Lee MorganCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  5. People v. ChampionMichigan Supreme Court · 1996

173 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API