Smith v. Ohio
Supreme Court of the United States
1Per curiam
This case raises the single question whether a warrantless search that provides probable cause for an arrest can nonetheless be justified as an incident of that arrest. A divided Ohio Supreme Court answered that question in the affirmative, reasoning that the search was neither remote in time nor place from the arrest. We disagree.
On a June evening, as petitioner and a companion exited a private residence and entered the parking lot of a YMCA, they were approached by two plainclothes officers of the Ash-land, Ohio, Police Department. The officers were driving-in an unmarked police vehicle.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by178 opinions
- Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. CrutcherTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
- United States v. Ruben PereaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Rodney Lee MorganCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- People v. ChampionMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
173 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.