In Re Imperial '400' National Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WHIPPLE, District Judge:
I. Introduction
This Court has before it four proposed Plans of Reorganization which have been forwarded to the SEC as being “worthy of consideration” and have been reviewed by that advisory body. 1 It is now my duty to determine whether one or more of the proposed Plans are fair, equitable and feasible, Bankruptcy Act, § 174.
In order to reach this determination, I have had the opportunity to preside over hearings in this reorganization for more than one and one-half years, have reviewed transcripts of prior hearings, have examined extensive exhibits, briefs, two…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Protective Committee for Independent Stockholders of TMT Trailer Ferry, Inc. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Vanston Bondholders Protective Committee v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Case v. Los Angeles Lumber Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. Du BoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Dow Corning Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
- King Resources Company v. BaerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Matter of Sound Radio, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
- In Re Elm Creek Joint VentureUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1988
- In re Imperial '400' National, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.