Hitchcock v. Frackelton
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Genesee; Wisner, J. Assumpsit by Allison L. Hitchcock against David S. Frackelton and others upon promissory notes. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant Frackelton brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
This was an action commenced by declaration on the part of Allison L. Hitchcock, as nominal plaintiff, the actual plaintiff being the Security Bank of Minnesota, on three promissory notes, against the defendants nominally, but against David S. Frackelton as the only one served, upon his irregular indorsement on the back of said notes. The indorsement of defendant Frackelton was made on the back of all the notes before delivery, and the consideration for the notes for which they were renewals was placed on the books of the Security Bank of Minnesota (the actual plaintiff herein) to the credit…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Smith v. SheldenMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Kulenkamp v. GroffMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Phelps v. AbbottMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Bonesteel v. ToddMichigan Supreme Court · 1861
- Schultz v. HowardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. . CaseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1904