Russell v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
1Dissent
Mr. Justice Harlan, whom Mr. Justice Clark joins,
dissenting.
The ground rules for testing the sufficiency of an indictment are twofold: (1) does the indictment adequately inform the defendant of the nature of the charge he will have to meet; (2) if the defendant is convicted, and later prosecuted again, will a court, under what has been charged, be able to determine the extent to which the defense of double jeopardy is available? United States v. Debrow, 346 U. S. 374.
Rule 7 (c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, effective in 1946, was of course not intended to abrogate or weaken…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Ex Parte BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- United States v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.