Legal Opinion

State v. Declue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 27, 2018No. ED 106588PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtAngela T. Quigless, J.

Lexington National Insurance Corporation ("Lexington"), surety on the bond for James Declue ("Defendant"), appeals from *757the judgment of the trial court denying its Motion to Set Aside Bond Forfeiture. Lexington argues the trial court erred in denying its Rule 74.06(b)1 Motion to Vacate Judgment because the Judgment of Bond Forfeiture was void under Rule 74.06(b)(3) for lack of notice, and irregular under Rule 74.06(b)(4) for failing to comply with the bond forfeiture procedures in Rule 33.14. Lexington also argues, because the Judgment of Bond Forfeiture was void pursuant to Rule 74.06(b),…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gibson v. BrewerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  2. Committee for Educational Equality v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  3. McCullough v. Commerce Bank, N.A.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Nicholson Construction Co. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Dobson v. Riedel Survey & Engineering Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State of Missouri v. James B. Declue, Lexington National Insurance Corporation, Surety-Appellant.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API