Legal Opinion
McCullough v. Commerce Bank, N.A.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided June 12, 2012No. WD 73219PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS H. NEWTON, Presiding Judge.
Mr. George McCullough and Mr. James Cranston appeals the trial court’s denial of their Rule 74.06(b) motion on the ground that the motion was an authorized post-trial motion subject to Rule 81.05(a)(2)’s automatic denial of such motions after 90 days. We reverse and remand.
Factual and Procedural Background
Mr. McCullough and Mr. Cranston (collectively “Appellants”) worked in the Recovery Department of Commerce Bank; Mr. Ron Nesemyer was the Department’s manager. McCullough v. Commerce Bank, 349 S.W.3d 389, 391 (Mo.App. W.D.2011). Mr. McCullough was a Recovery…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Taylor v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- In Re Marriage of HendrixSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
- Carthen v. Jewish Hospital of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Board of Educ. City of St. Louis v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- McCullough v. Commerce BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State ex rel. AJKJ, Inc., Relator v. The Honorable Craig E. HellmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 2019
- CITIMORTGAGE, INC., Plaintiff-Respondent v. GEORGE M. WAGGONERMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. DeclueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Christopher Cole v. The Kansas City Southern Railway CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024
- IN THE INTEREST OF M.M.B., Reynolds County Juvenile Office v. S.D.B.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.